Ветряки: The facts are that the cost of construction is close to 100 times that of any power plant and the power cost 3 to 4 times as much as coal or nuclear power. It makes absolutely no sense either from an economic or environmental standpoint. It is supported by those that profit from these installations and by politicians that either don’t know any better or are using the populist appeal of windmills to deceive us. http://community.comcast.net/comcastportal/board/message?board.id=Environment&thread.id=1735
Просчитать попробую. Нужны данные - сколько там чего, акрила, стали итд.
Я не против зелёных технологий, но подходить к ним надо с умом. А то, панимаишь, Нобелевки раздают за глобальное потепление и водородную экономику.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Про водородную экономику: Hydrogen has been called the least efficient and most expensive possible replacement for gasoline (petrol).
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/staff/robert_boyd/story/16179.html
Ветряки: The facts are that the cost of construction is close to 100 times that of any power plant and the power cost 3 to 4 times as much as coal or nuclear power. It makes absolutely no sense either from an economic or environmental standpoint. It is supported by those that profit from these installations and by politicians that either don’t know any better or are using the populist appeal of windmills to deceive us.
http://community.comcast.net/comcastportal/board/message?board.id=Environment&thread.id=1735
Просчитать попробую. Нужны данные - сколько там чего, акрила, стали итд.
Я не против зелёных технологий, но подходить к ним надо с умом. А то, панимаишь, Нобелевки раздают за глобальное потепление и водородную экономику.